Process Costing

In industries where similar types of products are produced, the process costing is the best cost accounting system. The products consume the same amount of overheads and direct costs. It would not be wise to apportioned cost to individual units. So, in process costing we calculate average cost per unit of output.

Average cost per unit of output = Total cost assigned to the product / number of units of output

In a manufacturing process, goods are not completed in a single process. Instead, they move from one process to the second process and from there to the third process. At the end, the finished goods are produced in the last process. So, in process costing we calculate cost per unit of each process.

For the manufacturing of any goods, we need materials, labors and overheads. So, we charge these elements of cost to each process account. In every process, it happens that the output received from the process is different from the input to the process. This means that the output would be less than the input to the process. This results in a loss. Loss can be of two types:

Normal Loss – This is the loss which manufacturer is already aware of. This cannot be avoided or controlled.

Abnormal Loss – This is the loss which is not of routine nature and which can be controlled by exercising some sort of cost and internal controls.

Abnormal Gain – This is the gain which arises due to total loss less than the normal loss.

Example

1.ABC produces chemicals for industrial usage. In its 1st process, ABC input 1,000 Kg of raw materials, but the actual output from this process is 800 Kg. The normal loss of this process is estimated @ 10%.

As you can see normal loss in process = 10% x 1,000 = 100 Kg

But total loss = 1,000 – 800 = 200 Kg

So, the extra 100 Kg is abnormal loss.

2.ABC produces chemicals for industrial usage. In its 1st process, ABC input 1,000 Kg of raw materials, but the actual output from this process is 920 Kg. The normal loss of this process is estimated @ 10.

As you can see normal loss in process = 10% x 1,000 = 100 Kg

But total loss = 1,000 – 920 = 80 Kg

So, the 20 Kg is abnormal gain.

Specimen Process Account

 Debit Credit
Materials
Labor
Overhead
Abnormal gain
 Normal loss
Abnormal loss
Transferred out to next
Process
 

In process account, we valued normal loss at Scrap value. Abnormal loss and transferred out units are measured at cost per unit.

Example

Input to the process = 10,000 units introduced in the process costing $ 50,000

Various process related expenses = $ 5,000

Direct labor = $20,000

Unit produced from the Process = 9,000 units

Other direct expenses = $ 11,000

Normal loss is estimated @ 10%. Normal loss scrape value is $ 1.

Solution

Total loss = 10,000 – 9,000 = $ 1,000

Abnormal loss = total loss – normal loss = 1,000 – 5,000 = $ 500

Scrap value of normal loss = 500 x 1 = $ 500

Cost per unit

= {(50,000 + 5,000 + 20,000 + 11,000) – 500} / 10,000 – 500 = 86,000 / 9,500 = 9 per unit

Process Account

 UnitsDebit UnitsCredit




Materials
Labor
Overhead
Direct expenses
Abnormal gain
10,000




50,000
5,000
20,000
11,000
Normal loss – scrap value
Abnormal loss (500×10.47)
Transferred out to next Process (9,000 x 9)
500
500
9,000
500
4,500
81,000
  86,000  86,000

Process Costing Problems and Solutions

The following information pertains to the goods in process No 3 the month of November, 1999:

Goods in process inventory November 1, (40,000 units 100% complete and 75% as to conversion costRs.387,000

Cost of 140,000 units transferred in form process No. 2 during November: Rs. 700,000
Manufacturing costs added in process No. 3 during November:

Direct materialRs.280,000
Direct laborRs.125,000
Factory overheadRs.375,000

On November 30, 50,000 units are still in process No. 3 which is 100% complete as to materials and 50% complete as to conversion cost.

a) i) Equivalent units of production
ii) Cost per unit
(iii) Cost of units transferred to finished goods warehouse
(iv) Cost of units in process, on November 30.
b) General Journal entries to record:
i) Transfer of 40,000 units from process No.2 to process No.3
ii) Manufacturing costs added in process No.3 during November
iii) Transfer of 130,000 units from process No.3 to finished
goods warehouse.

Solution

Equivalent Units of Process 3

MaterialLaborF.O.
Units transferred to finished goods130,000130,000130,000
Add: Units in process at end Material (50,000 X 100%) Labor (50,000 X 50%) OH (50,000 X 50%)50,000
Less: Units in process at start Material (40,000 X 100%) Labor (40,000 X 75%) Overhead (40,000 X 75%)25,00025,000
180,000155,000155,000
40,000
30,000
30,000
Equivalent Units140,000125,000125,000

Per Units Cost

CostEquivalent UnitsPer Unit
Cost of units transferred in from Process No. 2700,000140,0005.00
Cost of Process No.3
Material280,000140,0002.00
Labor125,000125,0001.00
Overhead375,000125,0003.00
Total per unit cost11.00

Process No. 3

Completed Units Cost during Nov, 1999

Beginning inventory cost387,000
Add: Cost completed during November Material Labor (40,000 X 25% X 1)10,000
Overhead (40,000 X 25% X 3)30,000
Less: Total cost of first 40,000 units Units started & finished during Nov.427,000
Material & conversion cost (90,000 X 11)99,000
Total cost of 130,000 units .14,17,000

Process No. 3

Cost of Units in Process at End

Cost from Process No.2 (50,000 X 5)250,000
Material (50,000 X 100% X 2)100,000
Labor (50,000 X 50% X 1)25,000
Overhead (50,000 X 50% X, 3)75,000
Cost of ending goods in Process Inventory450,000

Process No. 3

Journal Entries

No.ParticularsP.R.DebitCredit
1Work in process (No.3) Work in process (No.3) Cost of goods transferred from Process No.2 to Process No.3700,000700,000
2Work in process (No.3) Material780,000280,000
Accrued payroll125,000
Factory overhead375,000
To record the cost allocated to production in November
3Finished goods14,17,000
Work in process (No.3)14,17,000
Cost of goods transferred from Process No.3 to finished goods